BackhardGraphsMetaAtlassian

Accelerated Frequency Balance Solution

Problem Statement

Accelerated Frequency Balance

You are given an undirected graph with N vertices numbered from 1 to N and M edges. Each vertex i carries an integer weight w_i. A connected component is a maximal set of vertices where each pair is linked by a path of edges. For every connected component compute the sum of the weights of its vertices, take the absolute value of that sum, and report the largest such absolute value among all components.

Input

  • The first line contains two integers N and M (1 ≤ N ≤ 2·10^5, 0 ≤ M ≤ 2·10^5).
  • The second line contains N space‑separated integers w_1, w_2, …, w_N (‑10^9 ≤ w_i ≤ 10^9).
  • Each of the next M lines contains two integers u and v (1 ≤ u, v ≤ N, u ≠ v) describing an undirected edge between vertices u and v.

Output

  • Output a single integer: the maximum absolute component sum.

The graph may be disconnected; isolated vertices form components of size one. Your algorithm must run in O(N + M) time and use O(N + M) memory.

Example 1
Input
5 3 4 -2 1 -5 3 1 2 2 3 4 5
Output
3

Explanation: The graph has two components. Component A = {1,2,3} with sum 4 + (‑2) + 1 = 3, |3| = 3. Component B = {4,5} with sum (‑5) + 3 = -2, |‑2| = 2. The largest absolute sum is 3.

Example 2
Input
4 2 -7 -3 2 5 1 2 3 4
Output
10

Explanation: Component C = {1,2} gives sum (‑7) + (‑3) = -10, |‑10| = 10. Component D = {3,4} gives sum 2 + 5 = 7, |7| = 7. The maximum absolute component sum is 10.

Example 3
Input
6 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6
Output
21

Explanation: All vertices are connected, forming a single component with sum 1+2+3+4+5+6 = 21. Its absolute value is 21, which is the answer.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 2*10^5
  • 0 <= M <= 2*10^5
  • -10^9 <= w_i <= 10^9
  • The graph contains no self‑loops or multiple edges between the same pair of vertices.
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Accelerated Frequency Balance — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

GraphsHardDepth-First Search
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

Accelerated Frequency Balance

You are given an undirected graph with N vertices numbered from 1 to N and M edges. Each vertex i carries an integer weight w_i. A connected component is a maximal set of vertices where each pair is linked by a path of edges. For every connected component compute the sum of the weights of its vertices, take the absolute value of that sum, and report the largest such absolute value among all components.

Input

- The first line contains two integers N and M (1 ≤ N ≤ 2·10^5, 0 ≤ M ≤ 2·10^5).

- The second line contains N space‑separated integers w_1, w_2, …, w_N (‑10^9 ≤ w_i ≤ 10^9).

- Each of the next M lines contains two integers u and v (1 ≤ u, v ≤ N, u ≠ v) describing an undirected edge between vertices u and v.

Output

- Output a single integer: the maximum absolute component sum.

The graph may be disconnected; isolated vertices form components of size one. Your algorithm must run in O(N + M) time and use O(N + M) memory.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Accelerated Frequency Balance"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Candidates often incorrectly treat Accelerated Frequency Balance as a simple local array-sliding-window or greedy-propagation problem, which fails to account for cyclic dependencies between distant metrics. This naive local balancing leads to infinite propagation loops or incorrect metric sums because it lacks a global view of the constraint network.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The core optimization challenge in Accelerated Frequency Balance is resolving all N metric constraints globally in linear or near-linear time, even when the constraint graph contains complex directed cycles that render standard topological sorting useless.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

This graph-based balancing pattern is actively utilized in dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS) systems in multi-core processors, where clock frequencies of adjacent cores must be balanced to prevent thermal throttling while minimizing total system power draw.

The interviewer is evaluating whether you can recognize that a set of linear inequality constraints on an array of metrics can be mapped to a shortest-path graph problem, demonstrating deep system-level modeling skills.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n)
💾 Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

In the Accelerated Frequency Balance problem, we are tasked with finding the optimal sum of a sequence of N system metrics subject to pairwise balancing constraints. We model this sequence as a directed graph where each element of the array represents a node, and the allowable differences between adjacent or dependent metrics represent weighted directed edges. Standard array traversal fails because the constraint relations can propagate transitively across arbitrary distances in the network, creating complex dependency cycles. By transforming these constraints into a system of difference constraints, we can utilize a single-source shortest path algorithm like SPFA (Shortest Path Faster Algorithm) or Dijkstra's algorithm to resolve the optimal values of the metrics. This graph-theoretic approach guarantees that we can find the minimum or maximum valid metric sum, or correctly identify if the constraints are mathematically impossible (by detecting a negative cycle), in optimal polynomial time relative to the number of metrics and constraint edges.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How do we mathematically transform the frequency constraints in the Accelerated Frequency Balance problem into a directed graph structure?

Each metric index in the array is mapped to a graph vertex. For any constraint stating that the difference between metric x_i and metric x_j must not exceed a value w, we construct a directed edge from vertex j to vertex i with weight w; this allows us to use shortest-path relaxation to find a set of values that satisfies all constraints while minimizing the sum.

Q2Why is Bellman-Ford or SPFA preferred over Dijkstra's algorithm when computing the balanced metric sum if some frequency differences are negative?

If some frequency constraints allow for negative differences, the resulting graph can contain negative edge weights. Dijkstra's algorithm assumes non-negative edge weights and fails to compute correct shortest paths in their presence, whereas SPFA or Bellman-Ford can handle negative weights and reliably detect negative-weight cycles that indicate an impossible balancing configuration.

Q3How does your solution for Accelerated Frequency Balance handle a scenario where the array elements form disconnected components in the constraint graph?

We introduce a virtual source node connected to every actual metric node with a directed edge of weight 0. Running the shortest path algorithm from this virtual source ensures that all disconnected components are processed in a unified coordinate system, allowing us to find a valid relative balance for all elements and calculate the correct total sum.

Q4If the constraints in Accelerated Frequency Balance are modified such that metrics can only take discrete integer values, how does that affect the graph algorithm?

Because the constraint graph edges have integer weights, the shortest path values computed from a source node will naturally be integers, meaning the standard shortest-path approach still yields the optimal integer metric sum without needing complex integer programming solvers.

Examples

Example 1

Input

5 3
4 -2 1 -5 3
1 2
2 3
4 5

Output

3

Explanation: The graph has two components. Component A = {1,2,3} with sum 4 + (‑2) + 1 = 3, |3| = 3. Component B = {4,5} with sum (‑5) + 3 = -2, |‑2| = 2. The largest absolute sum is 3.

Example 2

Input

4 2
-7 -3 2 5
1 2
3 4

Output

10

Explanation: Component C = {1,2} gives sum (‑7) + (‑3) = -10, |‑10| = 10. Component D = {3,4} gives sum 2 + 5 = 7, |7| = 7. The maximum absolute component sum is 10.

Example 3

Input

6 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5 6

Output

21

Explanation: All vertices are connected, forming a single component with sum 1+2+3+4+5+6 = 21. Its absolute value is 21, which is the answer.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 2*10^5
  • 0 <= M <= 2*10^5
  • -10^9 <= w_i <= 10^9
  • The graph contains no self‑loops or multiple edges between the same pair of vertices.

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Use Depth-First Search to maintain a running state in O(N) time and O(1) auxiliary space.

Brute Force Approach

Iterate over all pairs/subarrays using nested loops and calculate the metric in O(N^2) time.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
function solution(nums) {
   let sum = 0;
   for (let num of nums) {
       sum += num;
   }
   return sum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

MetaAtlassian

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.