BackmediumArraysPhonePePayPal

Array Transformation Under Cyclic Shifts Solution

Problem Statement

Given an array of integers and a number of operations 'k', determine the lexicographically smallest array that can be obtained after performing 'k' operations of either shifting the last element to the front or reversing the array.

Example 1
Input
[1, 2, 3], 1
Output
[1, 2, 3]

Explanation: Step-by-step: We start with the array [1, 2, 3]. After one operation, we can either shift the last element to the front, resulting in [3, 1, 2], or reverse the array, resulting in [3, 2, 1]. However, the lexicographically smallest array that can be obtained after one operation is [1, 2, 3] itself, which is the original array.

Example 2
Input
[6, 5, 4], 0
Output
[6, 5, 4]

Explanation: Step-by-step: We start with the array [6, 5, 4]. Since we have 0 operations, the lexicographically smallest array that can be obtained is the original array itself, which is [6, 5, 4].

Constraints

  • Array length will be between 3 and 1000 elements.
  • The number of operations will range from 1 to 10^5.
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Array Transformation Under Cyclic Shifts — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

ArraysMediumcyclicity and pattern recognition
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(n)

Problem Description

Given an array of integers and a number of operations 'k', determine the lexicographically smallest array that can be obtained after performing 'k' operations of either shifting the last element to the front or reversing the array.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[1, 2, 3], 1

Output

[1, 2, 3]

Explanation: Step-by-step: We start with the array [1, 2, 3]. After one operation, we can either shift the last element to the front, resulting in [3, 1, 2], or reverse the array, resulting in [3, 2, 1]. However, the lexicographically smallest array that can be obtained after one operation is [1, 2, 3] itself, which is the original array.

Example 2

Input

[6, 5, 4], 0

Output

[6, 5, 4]

Explanation: Step-by-step: We start with the array [6, 5, 4]. Since we have 0 operations, the lexicographically smallest array that can be obtained is the original array itself, which is [6, 5, 4].

Constraints

  • Array length will be between 3 and 1000 elements.
  • The number of operations will range from 1 to 10^5.

Optimal Approach & Strategy

The optimal approach recognizes the cyclical pattern of 'pulsar' events and determines the effective number of shifts required, reducing the time complexity. It then considers the impact of the 'blackhole' event on the sequence to achieve a lexicographically smallest arrangement.

Brute Force Approach

The brute-force approach involves applying each event individually, leading to a time complexity of O(n^2) due to repeated shifting or inverting operations. This method is impractical for large inputs. It lacks efficiency in handling the cyclical nature of 'pulsar' events.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
function transformArray(arr, k) { let result = [...arr]; for (let i = 0; i < k; i++) { if (result[0] > result[result.length - 1]) { result = result.slice(1).concat(result.slice(0, 1)); } else if (result.slice(0, Math.floor(result.length / 2)).join(',') > result.slice(Math.floor(result.length / 2)).join(',')) { result = result.reverse(); } } return result; }

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

PhonePePayPal

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.