BackmediumArraysAmazon

Galactic Trade Route Optimization Solution

Problem Statement

In the context of optimizing interstellar logistics, you are provided with an array fuelChanges representing the net fuel adjustment (in units of megajoules) at each consecutive stop along a trade route. A valid trade segment is defined as a contiguous subarray where the signs of the fuel adjustments strictly alternate. Specifically, if the first element of the segment is positive, the second must be negative, the third positive, and so on. Conversely, if the first element is negative, the second must be positive, and so on. Note that zero is considered to break the alternation pattern and cannot be part of a valid alternating segment unless it is the sole element (though typically, we look for non-empty segments with defined signs). Your task is to determine the maximum possible sum of fuel adjustments over all valid alternating subarrays. If no valid alternating subarray of length greater than 1 exists, return the maximum single element value, as a single element is trivially considered a valid alternating sequence of length 1.

Example 1
Input
fuelChanges = [3, -2, 4, -1, 5]
Output
9

Explanation: The entire array [3, -2, 4, -1, 5] is a valid alternating sequence: +, -, +, -, +. The sum is 3 - 2 + 4 - 1 + 5 = 9. Other subarrays like [3, -2, 4] sum to 5, and [-2, 4, -1, 5] sum to 6. The maximum sum is 9.

Example 2
Input
fuelChanges = [5, 2, -3, 4, -1]
Output
5

Explanation: The first two elements [5, 2] are both positive, so they cannot form an alternating pair. The valid alternating segments starting from index 1 are: [2, -3] (sum -1), [-3, 4] (sum 1), [4, -1] (sum 3). The segment [2, -3, 4] is invalid because 2 and -3 alternate, but -3 and 4 alternate, wait: 2(+), -3(-), 4(+) is valid. Sum = 2 - 3 + 4 = 3. The segment [-3, 4, -1] is valid: -3(-), 4(+), -1(-). Sum = -3 + 4 - 1 = 0. The single element 5 is valid. The maximum sum among all valid segments is 5 (from the single element [5]).

Example 3
Input
fuelChanges = [-1, 2, -3, 4, -5, 6]
Output
3

Explanation: The entire array is a valid alternating sequence: -, +, -, +, -, +. Sum = -1 + 2 - 3 + 4 - 5 + 6 = 3. Let's check subarrays: [2, -3, 4, -5, 6] sum = 4. Wait, 2-3+4-5+6 = 4. Is [2, -3, 4, -5, 6] valid? Yes. Sum is 4. Let's re-evaluate. [-1, 2, -3, 4, -5, 6] sum is 3. [2, -3, 4, -5, 6] sum is 4. [4, -5, 6] sum is 5. [6] sum is 6. The maximum sum is 6.

Example 4
Input
fuelChanges = [10, -5, 1, -2, 3]
Output
10

Explanation: The entire array [10, -5, 1, -2, 3] is valid: +, -, +, -, +. Sum = 10 - 5 + 1 - 2 + 3 = 7. Subarray [10, -5] sum = 5. Subarray [1, -2, 3] sum = 2. The single element 10 is valid and has the highest sum.

Constraints

  • 1 <= fuelChanges.length <= 10^5
  • -10^9 <= fuelChanges[i] <= 10^9
  • The answer is guaranteed to fit in a 64-bit integer.
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Galactic Trade Route Optimization — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

ArraysMediumAlternating sum subarray
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

In the context of optimizing interstellar logistics, you are provided with an array fuelChanges representing the net fuel adjustment (in units of megajoules) at each consecutive stop along a trade route. A valid trade segment is defined as a contiguous subarray where the signs of the fuel adjustments strictly alternate. Specifically, if the first element of the segment is positive, the second must be negative, the third positive, and so on. Conversely, if the first element is negative, the second must be positive, and so on. Note that zero is considered to break the alternation pattern and cannot be part of a valid alternating segment unless it is the sole element (though typically, we look for non-empty segments with defined signs). Your task is to determine the maximum possible sum of fuel adjustments over all valid alternating subarrays. If no valid alternating subarray of length greater than 1 exists, return the maximum single element value, as a single element is trivially considered a valid alternating sequence of length 1.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Galactic Trade Route Optimization"

medium

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

This pattern, often called 'Longest Valid Subarray with Local Constraint,' is fundamental for optimizing sliding window or linear scan problems. It teaches that not all subarray problems require two pointers or binary search; sometimes, a simple state machine tracking the current valid segment length is sufficient.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key insight is recognizing that the validity of a subarray ending at index i depends only on the validity of the subarray ending at i-1 and the relationship between arr[i] and arr[i-1]. This allows us to discard the O(n^2) subarray enumeration and replace it with a single O(n) pass.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

This is analogous to network packet sequencing where packets must arrive in a specific alternating pattern (e.g., request-response-request-response) to maintain session integrity. If the pattern breaks, the session resets. Optimizing for the longest valid session helps in determining the maximum throughput before a timeout or reset occurs.

In interviews, explicitly state that you are using a 'state machine' approach. Define your states clearly: 'State 0: No active alternating sequence' and 'State 1: Active alternating sequence of length L'. This demonstrates structured thinking and makes the code easier to follow.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n)
💾 Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The problem requires identifying the longest contiguous subarray where the signs of elements strictly alternate. A naive approach would involve checking every possible subarray, leading to O(n^2) or O(n^3) time complexity, which is infeasible for large input sizes (n > 10^5). The optimal paradigm relies on the observation that the 'alternating property' is local and transitive. If a subarray ending at index i is valid, and the sign of element i+1 is opposite to element i, then the subarray ending at i+1 is also valid and its length is simply the previous length plus one. If the signs are the same (or one is zero, depending on strictness), the alternating sequence breaks, and we must start a new sequence from index i+1.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How would you modify this solution if the array contains zeros, and zeros are considered to break the alternating pattern?

Treat zero as a reset condition. If the current element is zero, the current alternating length resets to 0 (or 1 if we consider the zero itself as a start, but typically it breaks the chain). The logic remains O(n): if arr[i] == 0, set currentLen = 0; else if currentLen == 0, set currentLen = 1; else if sign(arr[i]) != sign(arr[i-1]), increment currentLen; else reset currentLen = 1.

Q2In a distributed system context, if this array represents a stream of events, how would you handle the state if the stream is split across multiple nodes?

This problem is inherently sequential and stateful. In a distributed stream, you would need to maintain the 'current alternating length' and the 'last sign' as state. If the stream is partitioned, each partition can compute its local max, but the global max cannot be simply aggregated because the boundary between partitions might break or extend the alternating sequence. You would need to pass the 'tail state' (last sign and current length) from the upstream node to the downstream node to correctly compute the global maximum.

Q3What is the space complexity of the optimal solution, and can it be reduced further?

The optimal solution runs in O(1) space. You only need to track two variables: the length of the current alternating subarray ending at the previous index, and the sign of the previous element. You do not need to store the entire array or any auxiliary data structures, making it highly memory efficient for large datasets.

Examples

Example 1

Input

fuelChanges = [3, -2, 4, -1, 5]

Output

9

Explanation: The entire array [3, -2, 4, -1, 5] is a valid alternating sequence: +, -, +, -, +. The sum is 3 - 2 + 4 - 1 + 5 = 9. Other subarrays like [3, -2, 4] sum to 5, and [-2, 4, -1, 5] sum to 6. The maximum sum is 9.

Example 2

Input

fuelChanges = [5, 2, -3, 4, -1]

Output

5

Explanation: The first two elements [5, 2] are both positive, so they cannot form an alternating pair. The valid alternating segments starting from index 1 are: [2, -3] (sum -1), [-3, 4] (sum 1), [4, -1] (sum 3). The segment [2, -3, 4] is invalid because 2 and -3 alternate, but -3 and 4 alternate, wait: 2(+), -3(-), 4(+) is valid. Sum = 2 - 3 + 4 = 3. The segment [-3, 4, -1] is valid: -3(-), 4(+), -1(-). Sum = -3 + 4 - 1 = 0. The single element 5 is valid. The maximum sum among all valid segments is 5 (from the single element [5]).

Example 3

Input

fuelChanges = [-1, 2, -3, 4, -5, 6]

Output

3

Explanation: The entire array is a valid alternating sequence: -, +, -, +, -, +. Sum = -1 + 2 - 3 + 4 - 5 + 6 = 3. Let's check subarrays: [2, -3, 4, -5, 6] sum = 4. Wait, 2-3+4-5+6 = 4. Is [2, -3, 4, -5, 6] valid? Yes. Sum is 4. Let's re-evaluate. [-1, 2, -3, 4, -5, 6] sum is 3. [2, -3, 4, -5, 6] sum is 4. [4, -5, 6] sum is 5. [6] sum is 6. The maximum sum is 6.

Example 4

Input

fuelChanges = [10, -5, 1, -2, 3]

Output

10

Explanation: The entire array [10, -5, 1, -2, 3] is valid: +, -, +, -, +. Sum = 10 - 5 + 1 - 2 + 3 = 7. Subarray [10, -5] sum = 5. Subarray [1, -2, 3] sum = 2. The single element 10 is valid and has the highest sum.

Constraints

  • 1 <= fuelChanges.length <= 10^5
  • -10^9 <= fuelChanges[i] <= 10^9
  • The answer is guaranteed to fit in a 64-bit integer.

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Traverse the array once, maintaining the length of the current alternating subarray ending at the previous index. If the current element's sign differs from the previous, increment the length; otherwise, reset the length to 1. Update the global maximum at each step.

Brute Force Approach

Iterate through all possible starting indices and for each, expand the subarray to the right, checking if the signs strictly alternate. Keep track of the maximum length found among all valid subarrays.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
/**
 * Problem: Galactic Trade Route Optimization
 * Find the maximum sum of a contiguous subarray where signs strictly alternate.
 * A valid segment must have no zeros and adjacent elements must have opposite signs.
 * 
 * @param {number[]} fuelChanges - Array of net fuel adjustments
 * @return {number} - Maximum sum of a valid alternating segment
 */
function maxAlternatingSum(fuelChanges) {
    const n = fuelChanges.length;
    if (n === 0) return 0;
    
    let maxSum = -Infinity;
    let i = 0;
    
    while (i < n) {
        // Skip zeros
        if (fuelChanges[i] === 0) {
            i++;
            continue;
        }
        
        // Start a new segment
        let currentSum = fuelChanges[i];
        let j = i + 1;
        
        // Extend the segment as long as signs strictly alternate
        while (j < n && fuelChanges[j] !== 0) {
            // Check if signs are opposite
            if ((fuelChanges[j] > 0 && fuelChanges[j-1] < 0) || 
                (fuelChanges[j] < 0 && fuelChanges[j-1] > 0)) {
                currentSum += fuelChanges[j];
                j++;
            } else {
                break;
            }
        }
        
        maxSum = Math.max(maxSum, currentSum);
        i = j;
    }
    
    return maxSum;
}

// Driver code
const readline = require('readline');
const rl = readline.createInterface({
    input: process.stdin,
    terminal: false
});

let lines = [];
rl.on('line', line => lines.push(line));
rl.on('close', () => {
    const n = parseInt(lines[0]);
    const fuelChanges = lines[1].split(' ').map(Number);
    console.log(maxAlternatingSum(fuelChanges));
});

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

Amazon

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.