BackmediumArraysSwiggy

Galactic Trade Route Optimization 3 Solution

Problem Statement

You are tasked with optimizing the yield of a specific segment within a linear array of trade coefficients. Given an array of integers representing the multipliers for consecutive trade sectors, determine the maximum possible product obtainable from any contiguous subarray. The subarray must contain at least one element. Note that the product can be negative, zero, or positive, and the magnitude of the numbers can be large, requiring careful handling of overflow or type selection depending on the language used.

Input: An array of integers nums where each element represents the trade multiplier for a specific sector. Output: Return the maximum product of any contiguous subarray within nums.

Example 1
Input
nums = [2, 3, -2, 4]
Output
6

Explanation: The contiguous subarray [2, 3] yields the maximum product: 2 * 3 = 6. Other subarrays like [3, -2, 4] yield -24, and [-2, 4] yields -8. The maximum is 6.

Example 2
Input
nums = [-2, 0, -1]
Output
0

Explanation: The subarray [-2] yields -2, [0] yields 0, and [-1] yields -1. The subarray [-2, 0] yields 0. The maximum product among all contiguous subarrays is 0.

Example 3
Input
nums = [-2, 3, -4]
Output
24

Explanation: The subarray [-2, 3, -4] yields (-2) * 3 * (-4) = 24. This is greater than the product of any other contiguous subarray, such as [3] which is 3, or [-2, 3] which is -6.

Example 4
Input
nums = [0, 2]
Output
2

Explanation: The subarray [0] yields 0, [2] yields 2, and [0, 2] yields 0. The maximum product is 2.

Constraints

  • 1 <= nums.length <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= nums[i] <= 10^4
  • The product of any subarray is guaranteed to fit in a 32-bit integer.
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Galactic Trade Route Optimization 3 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

ArraysMediumbasic-concepts
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

You are tasked with optimizing the yield of a specific segment within a linear array of trade coefficients. Given an array of integers representing the multipliers for consecutive trade sectors, determine the maximum possible product obtainable from any contiguous subarray. The subarray must contain at least one element. Note that the product can be negative, zero, or positive, and the magnitude of the numbers can be large, requiring careful handling of overflow or type selection depending on the language used.

Input: An array of integers nums where each element represents the trade multiplier for a specific sector.

Output: Return the maximum product of any contiguous subarray within nums.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Galactic Trade Route Optimization 3"

medium

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

This pattern is essential for understanding how state transitions in dynamic programming must account for non-monotonic operations. It teaches that the 'best' previous state might not be the one that leads to the best current state if the operation involves sign inversion. It is a critical stepping stone for more complex DP problems involving constraints on signs or modular arithmetic.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key insight is that the maximum and minimum products ending at index i depend only on the maximum and minimum products ending at index i-1. This allows the solution to be computed in a single pass with constant space, avoiding the need to store the entire DP table or use recursion which would incur O(n) space overhead.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

In financial risk modeling, this pattern mirrors the calculation of worst-case and best-case scenarios for asset portfolios where returns can be negative. Just as a negative return in one period can lead to a high positive return in the next if the asset value is low, tracking both min and max states ensures accurate risk and reward assessment over time.

During the interview, explicitly state that you are tracking two states: maxProd and minProd. Emphasize that the swap between max and min happens when the current number is negative. This demonstrates a clear understanding of the state transition logic and prevents the common mistake of only tracking the maximum.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n)
💾 Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The problem of finding the maximum product subarray is fundamentally different from the maximum sum subarray (Kadane's algorithm) because multiplication by a negative number can invert the sign of the product, turning a large negative value into a large positive one. Consequently, tracking only the maximum product ending at the current index is insufficient; one must also track the minimum product ending at the current index. This is because a negative minimum product, when multiplied by a negative current element, yields a new maximum. The state space must therefore maintain two variables: the maximum and minimum products achievable up to the current position.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1Why can't we simply use a modified Kadane's algorithm that only tracks the maximum product so far?

Kadane's algorithm works for sums because adding a negative number always decreases the sum. However, in multiplication, a negative number can flip the sign. If the current maximum product is negative and the current element is negative, the product becomes positive and potentially larger than the previous maximum. To capture this, we must track the minimum (most negative) product as well, as it represents the candidate for the next maximum when multiplied by a negative number.

Q2How does the presence of zero affect the dynamic programming state transition for maximum product subarray?

Zero acts as a reset point. If the current element is zero, both the maximum and minimum products ending at this index become zero. This effectively breaks the contiguous chain of non-zero elements. In the DP transition, if nums[i] is 0, maxProd and minProd are both set to 0, and the global maximum is updated with 0. This ensures that subarrays starting after the zero are considered independently in subsequent iterations.

Q3Can this problem be solved using a divide and conquer approach, and how does its complexity compare to the dynamic programming solution?

Yes, it can be solved using divide and conquer by splitting the array, finding the max product in the left half, right half, and the crossing subarray. However, calculating the crossing subarray product efficiently requires careful handling of signs and zeros, often leading to O(n log n) or O(n^2) complexity depending on implementation. The dynamic programming approach is superior with O(n) time and O(1) space, making it the preferred solution for interviews and production code.

Examples

Example 1

Input

nums = [2, 3, -2, 4]

Output

6

Explanation: The contiguous subarray [2, 3] yields the maximum product: 2 * 3 = 6. Other subarrays like [3, -2, 4] yield -24, and [-2, 4] yields -8. The maximum is 6.

Example 2

Input

nums = [-2, 0, -1]

Output

0

Explanation: The subarray [-2] yields -2, [0] yields 0, and [-1] yields -1. The subarray [-2, 0] yields 0. The maximum product among all contiguous subarrays is 0.

Example 3

Input

nums = [-2, 3, -4]

Output

24

Explanation: The subarray [-2, 3, -4] yields (-2) * 3 * (-4) = 24. This is greater than the product of any other contiguous subarray, such as [3] which is 3, or [-2, 3] which is -6.

Example 4

Input

nums = [0, 2]

Output

2

Explanation: The subarray [0] yields 0, [2] yields 2, and [0, 2] yields 0. The maximum product is 2.

Constraints

  • 1 <= nums.length <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= nums[i] <= 10^4
  • The product of any subarray is guaranteed to fit in a 32-bit integer.

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Use dynamic programming to track the maximum and minimum product ending at each index, updating them based on the previous state and the current element. Maintain a global maximum to store the overall best product found during the single pass through the array.

Brute Force Approach

Check every possible contiguous subarray by using two nested loops to calculate the product of each subarray. Keep track of the maximum product found across all subarrays.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
/**
 * @param {number[]} nums
 * @return {number}
 */
var maxProduct = function(nums) {
    if (nums.length === 0) return 0;
    
    let maxProd = nums[0];
    let minProd = nums[0];
    let result = nums[0];
    
    for (let i = 1; i < nums.length; i++) {
        const current = nums[i];
        
        // If current is negative, swap max and min
        if (current < 0) {
            [maxProd, minProd] = [minProd, maxProd];
        }
        
        // Calculate new max and min products
        maxProd = Math.max(current, maxProd * current);
        minProd = Math.min(current, minProd * current);
        
        // Update global result
        result = Math.max(result, maxProd);
    }
    
    return result;
};

// Driver code
const nums = [2, 3, -2, 4];
console.log(maxProduct(nums));

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

Swiggy

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.