BackmediumArraysPhonePeZomato

Optimizing Galactic Trade Routes Solution

Problem Statement

Given an integer array nums, each element represents an asteroid: a positive value denotes a valuable resource, a negative value denotes a hazardous asteroid. Find the maximum possible sum of a contiguous subarray that satisfies two conditions: (1) the subarray starts with a positive element, and (2) the signs of consecutive elements strictly alternate (positive, negative, positive, …). A subarray of length 1 consisting of a single positive element is valid. If no such subarray exists, return 0. The algorithm must run in linear time relative to the array length.

Example 1
Input
[4,-1,3,-2,5,-3,-4]
Output
9

Explanation: The longest alternating segment beginning with a positive number is [4,-1,3,-2,5]; its sum is 4-1+3-2+5=9, which is larger than any other valid segment.

Example 2
Input
[-5,2,-1,4,-2,6]
Output
9

Explanation: The subarray starting at index 1, [2,-1,4,-2,6], alternates signs and yields 2-1+4-2+6=9, which is the maximum achievable sum.

Example 3
Input
[1,2,3,-1,-2,4]
Output
4

Explanation: Only single‑element positive subarrays satisfy the alternating rule because any longer segment would contain two consecutive positives. The largest positive element is 4, so the answer is 4.

Constraints

  • 1 <= nums.length <= 100000
  • -1000000000 <= nums[i] <= 1000000000
  • The solution must use O(1) additional memory beyond the input array
  • Time complexity must be O(n)
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Optimizing Galactic Trade Routes — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

ArraysMediummax-subarray-sum
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

Given an integer array nums, each element represents an asteroid: a positive value denotes a valuable resource, a negative value denotes a hazardous asteroid. Find the maximum possible sum of a contiguous subarray that satisfies two conditions: (1) the subarray starts with a positive element, and (2) the signs of consecutive elements strictly alternate (positive, negative, positive, …). A subarray of length 1 consisting of a single positive element is valid. If no such subarray exists, return 0. The algorithm must run in linear time relative to the array length.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Optimizing Galactic Trade Routes"

medium

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Alternating‑sign subarrays appear in financial risk modeling, signal processing and load‑balancing where positive and negative impacts must offset each other; mastering this pattern teaches you to embed extra constraints into classic DP frameworks.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key insight is that only the immediately previous sign matters, so you can collapse the DP to two scalar variables instead of an O(n) table, cutting both time and space to linear and constant respectively.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Think of a power grid that alternates between generation (positive) and consumption (negative) phases; maximizing net surplus while respecting the alternating schedule mirrors the algorithmic requirement.

During an interview, compute dpPos and dpNeg on the fly, update the global answer only when dpPos is valid, and reset dpNeg to a sentinel when the sign pattern breaks – this avoids hidden bugs and keeps the code tidy.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n)
💾 Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The problem is a constrained variant of the classic maximum subarray (Kadane) where the subarray must start with a positive element and the signs must strictly alternate. A naïve solution enumerates every possible start‑end pair, checks the alternating condition and computes the sum, leading to O(n^2) time which explodes for large n. The optimal paradigm treats the alternating sign requirement as a state machine and uses dynamic programming: for each index we keep two values – the best sum of a valid subarray ending at that index with a positive last element (dpPos) and with a negative last element (dpNeg). Transition is simple: if nums[i] is positive we can either start a new subarray (value = nums[i]) or extend a subarray that previously ended with a negative element (dpNeg+nums[i]); similarly for a negative nums[i] we can only extend dpPos. Scanning the array once while updating these two states yields the global maximum in linear time.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How would you adapt Kadane's algorithm to enforce an alternating sign constraint and a positive start?

Maintain two DP variables dpPos and dpNeg. When the current element is positive, dpPos = max(nums[i], dpNeg+nums[i]); when negative, dpNeg = dpPos+nums[i] (or reset to negative infinity). Track the overall maximum of dpPos only because the subarray must end on a positive element.

Q2What edge case must you handle when the array contains only negative numbers?

Since the subarray must start with a positive element, the answer is 0 (or "no valid subarray") because no valid subarray can be formed; the algorithm should initialize the answer to 0 and never update it from a negative dpPos.

Q3Can the same DP idea be extended to a pattern that repeats every k signs (e.g., +, -, +, +, - …)?

Yes. Generalize the state array to k slots, each representing the best sum ending with the i‑th position of the pattern. Transition uses the previous slot in the pattern, yielding O(k·n) time and O(k) space.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[4,-1,3,-2,5,-3,-4]

Output

9

Explanation: The longest alternating segment beginning with a positive number is [4,-1,3,-2,5]; its sum is 4-1+3-2+5=9, which is larger than any other valid segment.

Example 2

Input

[-5,2,-1,4,-2,6]

Output

9

Explanation: The subarray starting at index 1, [2,-1,4,-2,6], alternates signs and yields 2-1+4-2+6=9, which is the maximum achievable sum.

Example 3

Input

[1,2,3,-1,-2,4]

Output

4

Explanation: Only single‑element positive subarrays satisfy the alternating rule because any longer segment would contain two consecutive positives. The largest positive element is 4, so the answer is 4.

Constraints

  • 1 <= nums.length <= 100000
  • -1000000000 <= nums[i] <= 1000000000
  • The solution must use O(1) additional memory beyond the input array
  • Time complexity must be O(n)

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Use two DP variables (dpPos, dpNeg) updated in a single left‑to‑right pass, yielding O(n) time and O(1) extra space.

Brute Force Approach

Check every possible start index, expand right while maintaining alternating signs, compute sums, and keep the best – O(n^2) time.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
function maxAlternatingSum(nums){
    let maxSum = 0;
    let curSum = 0;
    let expect = 0; // 1 positive, -1 negative, 0 not started
    for(const v of nums){
        if(curSum===0){
            if(v>0){curSum=v; expect=-1; if(curSum>maxSum)maxSum=curSum;}
        }else{
            const ok = (expect===1 && v>0) || (expect===-1 && v<0);
            if(ok){
                curSum+=v; expect=-expect; if(curSum>maxSum)maxSum=curSum;
            }else{
                if(v>0){curSum=v; expect=-1; if(curSum>maxSum)maxSum=curSum;}
                else{curSum=0; expect=0;}
            }
        }
    }
    return maxSum;
}
const fs=require('fs');
const data=fs.readFileSync(0,'utf8').trim().split(/\s+/).map(Number);
if(data.length===0)process.exit(0);
let n=data[0];
let arr=data.slice(1,1+n);
console.log(maxAlternatingSum(arr).toString());

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

PhonePeZomato

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.