BackhardStackGoogleAmazon

Matrix Stream Architect 43 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing matrix and stream metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target architect value under given operational constraints.

Example 1
Input
[100, 90, 80, 70, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10], 3
Output
270

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input [100, 90, 80, 70, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10], we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we sum the top 3 values (100, 90, 80) which are greater than K=3. The correct sum is 100 + 90 + 80 = 270.

Example 2
Input
[5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5], 3
Output
15

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input [5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5], we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we sum the top 3 values (5, 5, 5) which are greater than K=3. The correct sum is 5 + 5 + 5 = 15.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Matrix Stream Architect 43 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

StackHard2D Grid DP
TimeO(R*C)
|
SpaceO(C)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing matrix and stream metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target architect value under given operational constraints.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Matrix Stream Architect 43"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Monotonic stack patterns turn quadratic range problems into linear scans.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

Reducing the nested loops to a single pass per row cuts time from O(N³) to O(N).

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Similar to real‑time stock span or skyline silhouette calculations in financial and graphics engines.

Always pre‑allocate the height array and reuse the same stack across rows to avoid hidden allocations.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(R*C)
💾 Space:O(C)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

Monotonic stacks exploit the order of elements to answer range‑query problems in linear time. By maintaining a decreasing (or increasing) stack of indices, we can instantly locate the nearest smaller or larger element to the left and right, which is the key to converting a 2‑D matrix into a series of 1‑D histograms and then computing maximal rectangle areas.

A naïve solution would recompute the histogram for every possible sub‑matrix, leading to O(R·C·min(R, C)) or worse, which explodes on large grids. The optimal paradigm processes each row once, updates a height array, and runs a single‑pass stack algorithm per row, achieving O(R·C) time and O(C) auxiliary space while preserving correctness for any binary or weighted matrix stream.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How does a monotonic stack help compute the largest rectangle in a binary matrix?

It provides nearest smaller heights to the left and right in O(1) amortized, turning each row into a histogram where the maximal area is found in linear time.

Q2Why is the naïve O(N³) enumeration infeasible for large matrices?

Because the number of possible sub‑matrices grows quadratically with dimensions, leading to cubic time when each is examined, which exceeds typical time limits.

Q3What is the space complexity of the stack‑based solution and why?

O(C) auxiliary space, because the stack stores at most one index per column while the height array also uses O(C).

Examples

Example 1

Input

[100, 90, 80, 70, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10], 3

Output

270

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input [100, 90, 80, 70, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10], we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we sum the top 3 values (100, 90, 80) which are greater than K=3. The correct sum is 100 + 90 + 80 = 270.

Example 2

Input

[5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5], 3

Output

15

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input [5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5], we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we sum the top 3 values (5, 5, 5) which are greater than K=3. The correct sum is 5 + 5 + 5 = 15.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Update a height array per row and apply a single‑pass monotonic stack to each histogram, achieving linear time overall.

Brute Force Approach

Enumerate all possible top‑left and bottom‑right corners, verify each sub‑matrix, and compute its area, resulting in cubic time.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(R*C)
function solution(nums, k) {
     if (k >= nums.length) {
       return nums.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
     }
     return nums.sort((a, b) => b - a).slice(0, k).reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
   }

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.