BackhardDynamic ProgrammingGoogleAmazon

Payload Cipher Optimizer 46 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing payload and cipher metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target optimizer value under given operational constraints.

Example 1
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Output
30

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], we sum elements greater than 5 (6, 7, 8, 9, 10) giving output 30

Example 2
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Output
0

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9], we sum elements greater than 10 (none) giving output 0

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Payload Cipher Optimizer 46 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Dynamic ProgrammingHard2D Grid DP
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(k)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing payload and cipher metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target optimizer value under given operational constraints.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Payload Cipher Optimizer 46"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

DP transforms combinatorial explosion into tractable linear passes.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is to identify the minimal state representation that still respects the cipher constraints.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Similar to cache eviction policies where past decisions influence future resource allocation.

Cache the last k results in a circular buffer to keep memory footprints tiny and cache‑friendly.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n)
💾 Space:O(k)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The problem maps to a classic dynamic programming formulation where the optimal value for a prefix of the payload sequence depends on a finite set of previously computed states. By defining dp[i] as the best optimizer value considering the first i elements and incorporating the cipher constraints (e.g., mandatory gaps, additive penalties, or multiplicative factors), we can transition from dp[i‑1] or dp[i‑k] in O(1) time per element, turning an exponential search space into linear time. Naïve recursion explores every subset of elements, leading to O(2^n) time and quickly exhausting memory for n > 30. The DP paradigm leverages optimal substructure and overlapping subproblems, storing intermediate results to avoid recomputation and guaranteeing polynomial runtime.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How does defining the state dp[i] help avoid exponential blow‑up in this problem?

dp[i] captures the optimal result for the first i elements, so each larger subproblem reuses previously solved smaller ones. This eliminates redundant exploration of the same subsets.

Q2What is the impact of the cipher constraint (e.g., a minimum gap of k) on the DP transition?

It restricts the transition to dp[i‑k] instead of dp[i‑1], ensuring that selected elements respect the gap. The recurrence becomes dp[i] = max(dp[i‑1], value[i] + dp[i‑k]).

Q3When can we reduce the DP space from O(n) to O(1) for this class of problems?

If the recurrence only depends on a fixed number of previous states (like dp[i‑1] and dp[i‑k]), we can keep a sliding window of those values. This compresses the table to constant space.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

Output

30

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], we sum elements greater than 5 (6, 7, 8, 9, 10) giving output 30

Example 2

Input

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Output

0

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9], we sum elements greater than 10 (none) giving output 0

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Use a DP array (or rolling variables) with a recurrence that respects the minimum gap, updating in a single left‑to‑right pass.

Brute Force Approach

Enumerate every subset of elements, check if it satisfies the cipher constraints, and keep the maximum sum.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
function solution(nums) {
   let sum5 = 0;
   let sum10 = 0;
   for (let num of nums) {
       if (num > 5) sum5 += num;
       if (num > 10) sum10 += num;
   }
   return sum5 + sum10;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.