BackhardBinary TreesGoogleAmazon

Payload Sequence Detector 1 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing payload and sequence metrics, and an integer K, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target detector value as the sum of all metrics greater than K.

Example 1
Input
[10, 20, 30, 40, 50], 3
Output
150

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [10, 20, 30, 40, 50] and K = 3, we iterate through the sequence and sum all metrics greater than 3. Since all numbers (10, 20, 30, 40, 50) are greater than 3, we calculate the sum as 10 + 20 + 30 + 40 + 50 = 150.

Example 2
Input
[1, 2, 3], 5
Output
0

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3] and K = 5, we iterate through the sequence and sum all metrics greater than 5. Since none of the numbers (1, 2, 3) are greater than 5, the sum is 0.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Payload Sequence Detector 1 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Binary TreesHard2D Grid DP
TimeO(N log N) preprocessing + O(log N) per query
|
SpaceO(N)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing payload and sequence metrics, and an integer K, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target detector value as the sum of all metrics greater than K.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Payload Sequence Detector 1"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

The pattern of augmenting a binary search tree with aggregate information (like subtree sums) is a cornerstone for solving range‑sum and order‑statistic queries efficiently. Mastery of this pattern unlocks the ability to answer complex “greater‑than” or “top‑K” queries in logarithmic time, a skill highly prized in performance‑critical domains such as trading engines, recommendation systems, and large‑scale monitoring dashboards.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key insight is to avoid recomputing sums from scratch by storing partial aggregates during the build phase. By sorting the metrics and coupling them with prefix sums—or by embedding sums directly into BST nodes—we turn a linear‑time aggregation into a logarithmic‑time lookup, dramatically reducing both time and memory footprints for massive datasets.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Think of a distributed log‑aggregation service that must continuously compute the total size of logs exceeding a certain severity level. Instead of scanning every log entry, the service maintains a balanced index where each node stores the cumulative size of logs in its subtree, enabling instant retrieval of the total size for any severity threshold.

When coding this in an interview, first sketch the sorted‑array + binary‑search solution for static data; then mention how you’d upgrade to a self‑balancing BST or Fenwick tree if the problem adds updates. This shows you understand both the baseline and the scalable extension.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(N log N) preprocessing + O(log N) per query
💾 Space:O(N)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The Payload Sequence Detector problem belongs to the family of range‑query and order‑statistics challenges that often surface in binary‑tree‑centric interview settings. At its core, the task asks us to compute the sum of all metric values that exceed a threshold K. A naïve linear scan of the entire payload array yields an O(N) solution per query, which quickly becomes prohibitive when N reaches 10⁶ or when the system must answer thousands of K‑queries in real‑time. The optimal paradigm leverages a balanced binary search tree (BST) or a Fenwick/segment tree built over the sorted metric values, augmenting each node with a subtree‑sum field. This augmentation enables a logarithmic‑time query: by traversing the tree and discarding the left sub‑tree whenever its maximum value ≤ K, we can accumulate the sum of the right sub‑tree in O(log N). The same idea can be expressed with a binary indexed tree after coordinate compression, preserving O(log N) per query while using linear space. This approach transforms a potentially quadratic workload into a scalable solution suitable for high‑throughput services.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How would you design a data structure to support multiple queries of the form “sum of all payload metrics greater than K” on a static array of size N?

Preprocess the array by sorting the metric values and building a prefix‑sum array. For each query, binary‑search the first index where value > K and subtract the prefix sum up to that index from the total sum, achieving O(log N) per query. Alternatively, construct a balanced BST or Fenwick tree with each node storing the sum of its subtree, allowing O(log N) query and O(N) build time.

Q2Why does a simple linear scan become a bottleneck in large‑scale fintech platforms that need to evaluate payload thresholds in real time?

Fintech systems often process millions of transactions per second and must enforce risk limits instantly. A linear scan incurs O(N) latency per check, which translates to unacceptable response times under high load. By using an indexed tree or pre‑computed prefix sums, the system reduces each check to O(log N) or O(1) after binary search, meeting strict latency Service Level Agreements (SLAs).

Q3Explain how you would extend the solution to handle dynamic updates (insertions or deletions of payload metrics) while still answering sum‑greater‑than‑K queries efficiently.

Replace the static prefix‑sum approach with a self‑balancing BST (e.g., AVL or Red‑Black) or a Fenwick tree that supports point updates. Each node maintains the aggregate sum of its subtree. Insertions and deletions update O(log N) nodes, preserving O(log N) query time for sum‑greater‑than‑K, thus handling a mutable payload stream.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[10, 20, 30, 40, 50], 3

Output

150

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [10, 20, 30, 40, 50] and K = 3, we iterate through the sequence and sum all metrics greater than 3. Since all numbers (10, 20, 30, 40, 50) are greater than 3, we calculate the sum as 10 + 20 + 30 + 40 + 50 = 150.

Example 2

Input

[1, 2, 3], 5

Output

0

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3] and K = 5, we iterate through the sequence and sum all metrics greater than 5. Since none of the numbers (1, 2, 3) are greater than 5, the sum is 0.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Sort the metrics once, compute a prefix‑sum array, then answer each query with a binary search to locate the first element > K and subtract the appropriate prefix sum, achieving O(log N) per query.

Brute Force Approach

Iterate through the entire payload array for each query, adding every metric that exceeds K to a running total; this runs in O(N) per query.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(N log N) preprocessing + O(log N) per query
function solution(nums, k) { let sum = 0; for (let num of nums) { if (num > k) { sum += num; } } return sum; }

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.