BackhardLinked ListGoogleAmazon

Payload Token Synthesizer 7 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing payload and token metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target synthesizer value under given operational constraints.

Example 1
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 3
Output
0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] and the target value 3, we need to find the maximum element greater than 3. However, there is no such element in the array, so the output should be 0.

Example 2
Input
[10, 20, 30, 40, 50], 45
Output
50

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [10, 20, 30, 40, 50] and the target value 45, we need to find the maximum element greater than 45. The maximum element in the array is 50, so the output should be 50.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Payload Token Synthesizer 7 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Linked ListHardRecursive Backtracking
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(n)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing payload and token metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target synthesizer value under given operational constraints.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Payload Token Synthesizer 7"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Efficient sub‑list evaluation on linked structures is a core pattern for streaming and real‑time analytics.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is reducing the quadratic window checks to a single pass using prefix sums and constant‑time lookups.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Think of network packet streams where you must detect a window of traffic matching a quota without buffering the entire stream.

Always maintain a dummy head with prefix 0 and update the hashmap before moving the pointer to avoid off‑by‑one errors.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n)
💾 Space:O(n)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The problem reduces to finding an optimal sub‑sequence in a singly linked list under additive constraints, which is naturally modeled by prefix sums. By converting the list into a running total and storing each prefix in a hash map, we can query the needed complement in O(1) and thus avoid recomputing sums for overlapping windows.

Naïve enumeration of all O(n²) sub‑lists quickly explodes for n > 10⁵ because each sum requires a full traversal. The optimal paradigm combines a single pass to build prefix sums with a sliding‑window or hashmap lookup, guaranteeing linear time while preserving O(1) extra space beyond the map of seen prefixes.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1Why can't we use a double nested loop on a linked list for this problem?

Each inner loop would re‑traverse nodes, leading to O(n²) time which exceeds limits for large n. Linked lists lack random access, so nested loops are especially costly.

Q2How does a prefix‑sum hashmap enable O(n) solution on a singly linked list?

It stores the cumulative sum up to each node, allowing us to compute any sub‑list sum as a difference of two prefixes. A hashmap lookup for the needed complement is O(1), turning the overall scan into linear time.

Q3What edge case must be handled when the target synthesizer value is zero?

An empty sub‑list or a sub‑list whose sum is exactly zero must be considered, requiring initialization of the hashmap with a zero prefix at the dummy head. Forgetting this leads to missed valid solutions.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 3

Output

0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] and the target value 3, we need to find the maximum element greater than 3. However, there is no such element in the array, so the output should be 0.

Example 2

Input

[10, 20, 30, 40, 50], 45

Output

50

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [10, 20, 30, 40, 50] and the target value 45, we need to find the maximum element greater than 45. The maximum element in the array is 50, so the output should be 50.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Maintain a running prefix sum and a hashmap of previously seen sums; for each node, check if (prefix‑target) exists to decide in O(1) per node, achieving O(n) time.

Brute Force Approach

Generate every possible sub‑list, compute its sum, and compare to the target, resulting in O(n²) time.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
function solution(nums, k) {
   // Handle the case when the input array is empty
   if (nums.length === 0) {
       return 0;
   }
   // Initialize the maximum element greater than k
   let maxGreater = -Infinity;
   // Iterate over the input array
   for (let num of nums) {
       // Check if the current element is greater than k
       if (num > k) {
           // Update the maximum element greater than k
           maxGreater = Math.max(maxGreater, num);
       }
   }
   // Return the maximum element greater than k
   return maxGreater === -Infinity ? 0 : maxGreater;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.