BackhardBinary SearchGoogleAmazon

Payload Token Tracker 10 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing payload and token metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target tracker value under given operational constraints, where the tracker value is the sum of values greater than K.

Example 1
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Output
3

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], we first sort the array in ascending order. Then, we initialize a variable to store the tracker value and iterate through the array from left to right. If the current element is greater than K, we add it to the tracker value. Finally, we return the tracker value.

Example 2
Input
[10, 20, 30, 40, 50]
Output
5

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [10, 20, 30, 40, 50], we first sort the array in ascending order. Then, we initialize a variable to store the tracker value and iterate through the array from left to right. If the current element is greater than K, we add it to the tracker value. Finally, we return the tracker value.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Payload Token Tracker 10 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Binary SearchHard2D Grid DP
TimeO(log N)
|
SpaceO(1) extra (O(N) for prefix sums if not counted as extra)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing payload and token metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target tracker value under given operational constraints, where the tracker value is the sum of values greater than K.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Payload Token Tracker 10"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Efficient range queries on sorted data are a staple in high‑throughput services.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

Replace an O(N) scan with O(log N) search plus constant‑time arithmetic to meet latency SLAs.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Databases use B‑tree indexes to binary‑search rows and then aggregate values for analytics.

Cache the prefix sum once, and reuse it across queries to avoid recomputation.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(log N)
💾 Space:O(1) extra (O(N) for prefix sums if not counted as extra)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

Binary search exploits the monotonic property of sorted data to locate a boundary in logarithmic time, turning a linear scan into a divide‑and‑conquer process. By finding the first index where element > K, we can compute the sum of all larger values using a pre‑computed suffix or prefix sum array, achieving O(log n) query time.

A naive linear scan adds each element greater than K, which is O(n) and becomes prohibitive for massive streams or multiple queries. The optimal paradigm combines binary search for the cutoff point with O(1) range‑sum retrieval, dramatically reducing per‑query cost while preserving correctness even under tight time constraints.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1Why does binary search require the input array to be sorted?

Because it relies on the order to discard half the search space each step; unsorted data breaks the monotonic guarantee.

Q2How can you compute the sum of elements greater than K after locating the split index?

Maintain a prefix (or suffix) sum array; the answer is totalSum - prefixSum[splitIndex‑1] for a prefix sum.

Q3What is the time complexity of handling Q independent queries after preprocessing?

O(Q·log N) after O(N) preprocessing for the prefix sums; each query is a binary search plus O(1) arithmetic.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Output

3

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], we first sort the array in ascending order. Then, we initialize a variable to store the tracker value and iterate through the array from left to right. If the current element is greater than K, we add it to the tracker value. Finally, we return the tracker value.

Example 2

Input

[10, 20, 30, 40, 50]

Output

5

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [10, 20, 30, 40, 50], we first sort the array in ascending order. Then, we initialize a variable to store the tracker value and iterate through the array from left to right. If the current element is greater than K, we add it to the tracker value. Finally, we return the tracker value.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Pre‑compute a prefix sum array, binary‑search for the first >K, then compute the result with a single subtraction; O(log N) time per query.

Brute Force Approach

Iterate through the entire list, adding each element that exceeds K; O(N) time per query.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(log N)
function solution(nums, K) {
   nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
   let trackerValue = 0;
   for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
      if (nums[i] > K) {
         trackerValue += nums[i];
      }
   }
   return trackerValue;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.