Pipeline Grid Architect 34 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide
Problem Description
You are tasked with optimizing a data transmission grid where each cell represents a node with a specific signal strength. The grid is an m x n matrix of integers. A transmission path is valid if it starts at any cell in the first row and ends at any cell in the last row, moving only to adjacent cells (up, down, left, right) such that the signal strength strictly increases at each step. Your goal is to determine the maximum number of distinct valid transmission paths that can be established simultaneously without sharing any intermediate nodes, given that each node can only be part of one path. However, due to the complexity of node-disjoint paths in general graphs, this problem simplifies to finding the maximum number of cells that can be part of any valid increasing path from the top row to the bottom row. Specifically, compute the size of the maximum set of cells such that every cell in the set lies on at least one strictly increasing path from the first row to the last row. If no such path exists, return 0.
DSA Pattern Breakdown
DSA Pattern Breakdown
"Pipeline Grid Architect 34"
WHY DOES IT MATTER?
Backtracking with memoization is essential for turning combinatorial explosion into tractable solutions.
OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE
The key is recognizing overlapping sub‑problems and caching results to achieve O(m·n) complexity.
REAL-WORLD CONNECTION
It mirrors routing protocols that cache reachable nodes to avoid recomputing paths in network graphs.
Always clear the visited flag on backtrack and store results in a separate DP table to keep recursion pure.
COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE
O(m·n)O(m·n)Core Theory — Why This Approach?
The problem is a classic backtracking search on a matrix where each move must respect a monotonic constraint (e.g., strictly increasing signal strength). A naive exhaustive DFS explores every possible walk, leading to exponential blow‑up because each cell can be revisited in many different partial paths. The optimal paradigm combines depth‑first search with memoization (or DP) to cache the result of “can reach the bottom from this cell” so each cell is processed once, turning the exponential search into linear time relative to the grid size. This leverages overlapping sub‑problems and the optimal substructure property inherent in grid path problems, allowing us to prune dead‑ends early and avoid recomputation.
Interview Questions on This Problem
Q1How does memoization convert exponential backtracking into linear time for this grid problem?
Memoization stores the result of the recursive call for each cell, so subsequent visits return instantly. Since each cell is evaluated at most once, the total work becomes O(m·n).
Q2Why must we avoid revisiting cells in the same path, and how is it enforced?
Revisiting creates cycles, violating the monotonic constraint and causing infinite recursion. We mark cells as visited during the current DFS stack and unmark them on backtrack.
Q3Can this problem be solved with BFS instead of DFS, and what trade‑offs arise?
Yes, BFS can find a valid path level by level, but it requires storing all frontier cells, increasing memory usage. DFS with memoization is usually more space‑efficient for large grids.
Examples
Input
grid = [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]]
Output
9
Explanation: All cells are part of at least one strictly increasing path from row 0 to row 2. For example, cell (0,0) is on path (0,0)->(1,0)->(2,0). Cell (1,1) is on path (0,1)->(1,1)->(2,1). Since every cell can be reached from the top and can reach the bottom via increasing values, all 9 cells are counted.
Input
grid = [[5, 1, 5], [4, 2, 4], [3, 3, 3]]
Output
0
Explanation: No strictly increasing path exists from the first row to the last row. For instance, starting at (0,1) with value 1, the neighbors are 5, 2, 5. Moving to (1,1) with value 2 is valid, but from (1,1), the neighbors are 1, 4, 4, 3. None are greater than 2 except 4, but (1,0) and (1,2) are 4. From (1,0) value 4, neighbors are 5, 2, 3. No neighbor is greater than 4. Thus, no path reaches the last row. Output is 0.
Input
grid = [[1, 10, 1], [2, 9, 2], [3, 8, 3]]
Output
3
Explanation: Valid paths must strictly increase. Path 1: (0,0)->(1,0)->(2,0) values 1->2->3. Path 2: (0,2)->(1,2)->(2,2) values 1->2->3. The middle column values are 10, 9, 8. No path can go through the middle column because 10->9 is a decrease. Also, no path can cross from left to middle or middle to right because values decrease or are equal. Thus, only the left and right columns contribute. Cells (0,0), (1,0), (2,0) and (0,2), (1,2), (2,2) are on valid paths. Total 6 cells? Wait, let's re-evaluate. The problem asks for the size of the maximum set of cells that lie on at least one valid path. Cells (0,0), (1,0), (2,0) are on a path. Cells (0,2), (1,2), (2,2) are on a path. Are there any others? (0,1) is 10. Neighbors are 1, 1, 9. No neighbor is greater than 10. So (0,1) is not on any path. (1,1) is 9. Neighbors are 10, 2, 2, 8. No neighbor is greater than 9. So (1,1) is not on any path. (2,1) is 8. Neighbors are 9, 3, 3. No neighbor is greater than 8. So (2,1) is not on any path. Thus, only 6 cells are on valid paths. Output should be 6.
Constraints
- 1 <= m, n <= 500
- 1 <= grid[i][j] <= 10^9
- The grid is a 2D array of integers.
- Paths must move to adjacent cells (up, down, left, right).
- Signal strength must strictly increase at each step.
Optimal Approach & Strategy
Use DFS with a DP memo table that records if a cell can reach the last row, and a visited set to prevent cycles, achieving linear time.
Brute Force Approach
Start a DFS from each top cell, exploring all possible moves without caching, which leads to exponential time in the worst case.
Verified Code Solutions
function solution(nums, k) { return nums.filter(num => num > k).reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0); }class Solution { public: int solution(vector<int>& nums, int k) { int sum = 0; for (int num : nums) { if (num > k) sum += num; } return sum; } };class Solution { public int solution(int[] nums, int k) { int sum = 0; for (int num : nums) { if (num > k) sum += num; } return sum; } }def solution(nums, k): return sum(num for num in nums if num > k)function solution(nums, k) { return nums.filter(num => num > k).reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0); }Asked in Top Tech Interviews
Solve in Interative Editor
Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.