BackeasyDynamic ProgrammingGoogleAmazon

Protocol Tome Aligner 33 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing protocol and tome metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target aligner value under given operational constraints.

Example 1
Input
[50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
Output
120

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given an array of integers, we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we select the K largest values (in this case, K = 3) and sum them up. The sum of the K largest values is 50 + 40 + 30 = 120.

Example 2
Input
[10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
Output
27

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given an array of integers, we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we select the K largest values (in this case, K = 3) and sum them up. The sum of the K largest values is 10 + 9 + 8 = 27.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Protocol Tome Aligner 33 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Dynamic ProgrammingEasyBitmasking
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(n)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing protocol and tome metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target aligner value under given operational constraints.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Protocol Tome Aligner 33"

easy

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

DP with sliding‑window optimization turns a potentially quadratic problem into linear, essential for real‑time protocol alignment.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is reducing the state transition from scanning all previous indices to constant‑time lookup via a deque.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Similar techniques power network packet scheduling where only recent packets affect current decisions.

Pre‑compute prefix aggregates and maintain a clean monotonic structure to avoid hidden O(n²) loops.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n)
💾 Space:O(n)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The optimal solution relies on dynamic programming where dp[i] stores the best aligner value for the prefix ending at index i. By expressing dp[i] as a function of earlier states that satisfy the operational constraints, we can transition in O(1) using prefix aggregates or a monotonic deque, turning an otherwise quadratic recurrence into linear time. Naïve enumeration of all sub‑sequences leads to O(n²) or worse, which quickly exceeds limits for large n because each element would be compared against every previous one. The DP paradigm captures overlapping sub‑problems and optimal substructure, allowing us to reuse computed results and prune the search space dramatically.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How does dynamic programming convert an exponential‑time brute‑force into polynomial time for this problem?

It records the optimal result for each prefix, avoiding recomputation of overlapping sub‑problems. Each state is computed once, yielding O(n) time instead of exploring all combinations.

Q2What data structure enables the O(1) transition for dp[i] in the optimized solution?

A monotonic deque or prefix‑sum array maintains the best candidate values under the constraints. It provides constant‑time access to the maximum/minimum needed for the recurrence.

Q3Why is it safe to discard older states when using a sliding‑window DP for this problem?

Older states fall outside the constraint window and can never contribute to future transitions. Removing them keeps the algorithm linear while preserving correctness.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]

Output

120

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given an array of integers, we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we select the K largest values (in this case, K = 3) and sum them up. The sum of the K largest values is 50 + 40 + 30 = 120.

Example 2

Input

[10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]

Output

27

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given an array of integers, we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we select the K largest values (in this case, K = 3) and sum them up. The sum of the K largest values is 10 + 9 + 8 = 27.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Use DP with a sliding‑window and a monotonic deque to compute each state in O(1), achieving O(n) total time.

Brute Force Approach

Enumerate every possible sub‑sequence, compute its aligner value, and keep the maximum, resulting in O(n²) or worse.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
function solution(nums, k) {
   if (nums.length === 0 || k === 0) return 0;
   nums.sort((a, b) => b - a);
   let sum = 0;
   for (let i = 0; i < k; i++) {
       sum += nums[i];
   }
   return sum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.