BackmediumSliding WindowGoogleAmazon

Sensor Checkpoint Synthesizer 22 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing sensor and checkpoint metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target synthesizer value under given operational constraints.

Example 1
Input
[[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], []]
Output
0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array of sub-arrays, we iterate over each sub-array. Since the last sub-array is empty, we return 0 as there are no elements to process.

Example 2
Input
[[], [1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]
Output
0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array of sub-arrays, we iterate over each sub-array. Since the first sub-array is empty, we return 0 as there are no elements to process.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Sensor Checkpoint Synthesizer 22 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Sliding WindowMediumFixed/Dynamic Window
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing sensor and checkpoint metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target synthesizer value under given operational constraints.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Sensor Checkpoint Synthesizer 22"

medium

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Sliding windows turn quadratic scans into linear passes, essential for real‑time sensor streams.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is to update the window’s aggregate in O(1) instead of recomputing from scratch.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Think of a moving average filter on a live telemetry feed that updates every millisecond.

Keep the window’s data structure minimal—prefer counters or deques over full copies to stay cache‑friendly.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n)
💾 Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

Sliding‑window techniques convert a naïve O(n·k) scan—where k is the window size—into a linear O(n) pass by reusing information from the previous window. By maintaining a running aggregate (sum, max, frequency map, etc.) and updating it as the window slides one element forward, we avoid recomputing from scratch for each position, which is crucial for large n (up to 10^6 or more). The optimal paradigm leverages two pointers (left and right) that define the current window, adjusting them based on problem‑specific constraints while preserving the invariant that the window’s data structure always reflects the exact segment under consideration. This yields deterministic linear time and constant or logarithmic auxiliary space, making it the de‑facto solution for any “window‑based” metric computation.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How does a sliding window reduce time complexity compared to recomputing the metric for each subarray?

It updates the metric incrementally by adding the new element and removing the old one, avoiding a full recompute. This turns an O(n·k) process into O(n).

Q2When would you need a deque instead of simple addition/subtraction in a sliding window?

A deque efficiently maintains the maximum or minimum of the current window in O(1) amortized time. Simple arithmetic only works for additive metrics like sum or count.

Q3What is the role of the two‑pointer technique in sliding‑window problems?

The pointers mark the window’s boundaries and move monotonically, ensuring each element is visited at most twice. This guarantees linear overall work.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], []]

Output

0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array of sub-arrays, we iterate over each sub-array. Since the last sub-array is empty, we return 0 as there are no elements to process.

Example 2

Input

[[], [1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]

Output

0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array of sub-arrays, we iterate over each sub-array. Since the first sub-array is empty, we return 0 as there are no elements to process.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Use two pointers to slide the window and update the metric incrementally, achieving O(n) time and O(1) extra space.

Brute Force Approach

Iterate over every possible window and recompute the metric from scratch for each, leading to O(n·k) time.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
function solution(nums) {
   let synthesizerValue = 0;
   for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
       if (nums[i].length > 0) {
           for (let j = 0; j < nums[i].length; j++) {
               synthesizerValue += nums[i][j];
           }
       }
   }
   return synthesizerValue;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.