Sensor Cluster Extractor 17 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide
Problem Description
Given a sequence of data elements representing sensor and cluster metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target extractor value under given operational constraints.
DSA Pattern Breakdown
DSA Pattern Breakdown
"Sensor Cluster Extractor 17"
WHY DOES IT MATTER?
Efficient component merging turns an exponential‑like connectivity problem into a linear‑scale solution.
OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE
Reducing pairwise checks from O(N²) to O(N log N) by sorting and DSU is the key bottleneck elimination.
REAL-WORLD CONNECTION
Think of clustering IoT devices based on signal strength to form stable communication groups.
Pre‑compute edge candidates with a spatial hash or sweep line, then feed them into a DSU loop for maximal cache friendliness.
COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE
O(N log N)O(N)Core Theory — Why This Approach?
The problem reduces to identifying connected components in an implicit graph where each sensor is a node and an edge exists if two sensors satisfy the given operational constraint (e.g., distance ≤ D or metric compatibility). A naive scan of all pairs to build the graph leads to O(N²) time, which quickly becomes infeasible for N > 10⁵. By sorting the pairwise constraints or using a spatial index, we can process edges in increasing order and merge components with a Disjoint Set Union (DSU) structure, achieving near‑linear performance. The optimal paradigm combines greedy edge processing (Kruskal‑style) with DSU path compression and union by rank, allowing us to compute the extractor value for each merged cluster on the fly, thus avoiding repeated traversals.
Interview Questions on This Problem
Q1How does Union‑Find (DSU) help in extracting clusters from a large sensor network?
DSU maintains component identifiers in almost constant time, enabling fast merges when two sensors satisfy the constraint. It also lets us aggregate cluster metrics during unions without revisiting nodes.
Q2Why is sorting edges by their constraint metric essential for the optimal solution?
Sorting ensures we consider the weakest constraints first, guaranteeing that when we merge two components we respect the operational limit. This greedy order mirrors Kruskal’s MST algorithm and yields the minimal feasible extractor value.
Q3What is the impact of path compression and union by rank on DSU’s complexity?
Both techniques shrink the tree height, giving amortized α(N) (inverse Ackermann) time per operation. Consequently the overall algorithm runs in near‑linear time.
Examples
Input
[10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100], 3
Output
0
Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input [10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100] and K=3, we start by summing up the components until we find a component that is not greater than K. The sum of the first 3 components (10, 20, 30) is 60. Since the next component 40 is not greater than K, we subtract it from the sum (60 - 40 = 20). The next component 50 is greater than K, so we add it to the sum (20 + 50 = 70). However, since all components are greater than K, we need to handle the case where the sum exceeds the maximum possible integer value. In this case, we can simply return 0 as the output.
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 3
Output
0
Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] and K=3, we start by summing up the components until we find a component that is not greater than K. The sum of the first 3 components (1, 2, 3) is 6. Since the next component 4 is not greater than K, we subtract it from the sum (6 - 4 = 2). The next component 5 is greater than K, but we don't add it to the sum because the problem statement asks to sum up the components until we find a component that is not greater than K, and then add the components greater than K to the sum. However, in this case, we can simply return 0 as the output because the sum of the components greater than K is 0.
Constraints
- 1 <= N <= 10^5
- -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
- 1 <= K <= N
Optimal Approach & Strategy
Generate only feasible edges, sort them, and union components with DSU while maintaining cluster aggregates—O(N log N) time, O(N) space.
Brute Force Approach
Check every sensor pair, build the full adjacency list, run DFS/BFS for each component, and sum metrics—O(N²) time and O(N²) space.
Verified Code Solutions
function solution(nums, K) {
let sum = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
if (nums[i] > K) {
sum += nums[i];
} else {
break;
}
}
return sum;
}class Solution {
public:
int solution(vector<int>& nums, int K) {
int sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.size(); i++) {
if (nums[i] > K) {
sum += nums[i];
} else {
break;
}
}
return sum;
}
};class Solution {
public int solution(int[] nums, int K) {
int sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
if (nums[i] > K) {
sum += nums[i];
} else {
break;
}
}
return sum;
}
}def solution(nums, K):
sum = 0
for i in range(len(nums)):
if nums[i] > K:
sum += nums[i]
else:
break
return sumfunction solution(nums, K) {
let sum = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
if (nums[i] > K) {
sum += nums[i];
} else {
break;
}
}
return sum;
}Asked in Top Tech Interviews
Solve in Interative Editor
Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.