Tarjan Component Component Architect — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

TreesHardSuffix Automaton

TimeO(N + M)

SpaceO(N + M)

Problem Description

You are tasked with analyzing a directed graph representing a complex state machine with $N$ nodes and $M$ edges. The system's stability depends on identifying all strongly connected components (SCCs) and determining the 'architectural weight' of each component. The architectural weight of an SCC is defined as the sum of the node values within that component, multiplied by the number of nodes in the component. Your goal is to compute the total architectural weight across all SCCs in the graph.

Given an array values of length $N$ where values[i] represents the weight of node $i$, and a list of directed edges edges where each edge is a pair [u, v] indicating a connection from node $u$ to node $v$, calculate the sum of the architectural weights of all strongly connected components. Note that a single node with no self-loop or incoming/outgoing edges forming a cycle is considered an SCC of size 1.

The input will be a connected or disconnected directed graph. You must use an efficient algorithm to handle large inputs. The output should be a single integer representing the total architectural weight.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Tarjan Component Component Architect"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Detecting SCCs is fundamental for reasoning about cycles, deadlocks, and component isolation in directed systems; many real‑world problems—like package dependency resolution, circuit analysis, and social network clustering—reduce to SCC identification.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key insight is the low‑link value: by tracking the earliest reachable discovery index from a node’s descendants, we can decide exactly when an SCC is complete without revisiting edges, collapsing the whole problem to a single linear DFS.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

In distributed micro‑service architectures, an SCC corresponds to a set of services that are mutually dependent; breaking such cycles is essential for reliable deployment pipelines, just as Tarjan’s algorithm isolates these cycles efficiently.

When coding Tarjan, keep the stack operations and low‑link updates tight; a common pitfall is forgetting to update low‑link on back‑edges to nodes still on the stack, which leads to incorrect component boundaries.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(N + M)

💾 Space:O(N + M)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

Strongly Connected Components (SCCs) are maximal sub‑graphs where every vertex can reach every other vertex via directed paths. Detecting SCCs in a directed graph is a classic problem solved in linear time using depth‑first search based algorithms such as Kosaraju’s two‑pass method or Tarjan’s single‑pass algorithm. Tarjan’s algorithm maintains a stack of visited vertices and assigns each vertex a low‑link value – the smallest discovery index reachable from that vertex – allowing it to pop an entire SCC as soon as the DFS backtracks to the root of that component. Naïve approaches like running a BFS/DFS from each node to test mutual reachability explode to O(N·(N+M)) time, which is infeasible for the typical constraints of N up to 2·10^5 and M up to 5·10^5. The optimal paradigm leverages the properties of DFS ordering and low‑link values to collapse each SCC in a single linear pass, after which the required architectural weight can be accumulated in O(1) per vertex.

Once SCCs are identified, computing the architectural weight is straightforward: for each component we keep a running sum of node values and a count of vertices. The weight = sum * count. Because the SCC decomposition already visits each vertex exactly once, the weight calculation can be performed on‑the‑fly without extra traversals, preserving the overall O(N+M) complexity. This combination of Tarjan’s SCC detection and incremental aggregation yields a solution that scales to the hardest test cases while using only linear auxiliary memory.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How does Tarjan’s algorithm identify the root of an SCC during DFS?

Each vertex gets a discovery index (disc) and a low‑link value (low). When a vertex's low equals its discovery index, it means no back‑edge from its descendants reaches an earlier vertex, so the vertex is the root of an SCC; all vertices on the stack up to it belong to that SCC and are popped.

Q2Why can we compute the architectural weight of each SCC in a single pass after SCC detection?

During the pop operation of an SCC, we already have all its members on the stack. By accumulating the sum of node values and counting the vertices while popping, we directly obtain sum and size, allowing weight = sum * size to be calculated without a second traversal.

Q3Compare Kosaraju’s two‑pass SCC algorithm with Tarjan’s one‑pass algorithm in terms of time, space, and practical performance.

Both run in O(N+M) time, but Kosaraju requires two full DFS passes and an explicit reversed graph, doubling memory for adjacency lists. Tarjan uses a single DFS, a stack, and low‑link values, needing only the original adjacency list, which usually results in lower constant factors and better cache locality.

Examples

Example 1

Input

values = [1, 2, 3, 4], edges = [[0, 1], [1, 0], [2, 3], [3, 2]]

Output

Explanation: There are two SCCs: {0, 1} and {2, 3}. For SCC {0, 1}, the sum of values is 1+2=3, size is 2, weight is 3*2=6. For SCC {2, 3}, the sum of values is 3+4=7, size is 2, weight is 7*2=14. Total weight is 6+14=20. Wait, let me recalculate. 1+2=3, 3*2=6. 3+4=7, 7*2=14. 6+14=20. My previous output was wrong. Let's fix the example to be consistent. Let's use values = [1, 2, 3, 4], edges = [[0, 1], [1, 0], [2, 3], [3, 2]]. SCC1: {0,1}, sum=3, size=2, weight=6. SCC2: {2,3}, sum=7, size=2, weight=14. Total=20. I will update the output to 20.

Example 2

Input

values = [5, 10, 15], edges = [[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 0]]

Output

Explanation: All three nodes form a single SCC {0, 1, 2}. The sum of values is 5+10+15=30. The size is 3. The architectural weight is 30*3=90. Wait, 30*3 is 90. Let me re-read the definition. Sum of node values multiplied by number of nodes. 30 * 3 = 90. I will update the output to 90.

Example 3

Input

values = [1, 1, 1, 1], edges = [[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3]]

Output

Explanation: There are no cycles. Each node is its own SCC. SCC {0}: sum=1, size=1, weight=1. SCC {1}: sum=1, size=1, weight=1. SCC {2}: sum=1, size=1, weight=1. SCC {3}: sum=1, size=1, weight=1. Total weight is 1+1+1+1=4.

Constraints

1 <= N <= 10^5
0 <= M <= 10^5
1 <= values[i] <= 10^9
0 <= u, v < N
The graph may contain self-loops and multiple edges.

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Apply Tarjan’s single‑pass DFS to find all SCCs in O(N+M) time, aggregating sum and size during stack pops to compute each component’s weight instantly.

Brute Force Approach

Run a DFS/BFS from every vertex to check mutual reachability and group vertices into SCCs, then compute weights; this is O(N·(N+M)).

Verified Code Solutions

Language:

JavaScript Solution

Time: O(N + M)

function solution(nums) {
   let sum = 0;
   for (let num of nums) {
       sum += num;
   }
   return sum;
}

class Solution {
   public:
   int solution(vector<int>& nums) {
       int sum = 0;
       for (int num : nums) {
           sum += num;
       }
       return sum;
   }
};

class Solution {
   public int solution(int[] nums) {
       int sum = 0;
       for (int num : nums) {
           sum += num;
       }
       return sum;
   }
}

def solution(nums):
   sum = 0
   for num in nums:
       sum += num
   return sum

function solution(nums) {
   let sum = 0;
   for (let num of nums) {
       sum += num;
   }
   return sum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

MetaUber

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.

Tarjan Component Component Architect Solution

Problem Statement

Input

Output

Input

Output

Input

Output

Constraints

More Trees

Optimized Approach

Brute Force Approach

Step-by-Step Dry Run

Tested Solutions

Tarjan Component Component Architect — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Problem Description

DSA Pattern Breakdown

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

Interview Questions on This Problem

Examples

Constraints

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Brute Force Approach

Verified Code Solutions

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

Solve in Interative Editor