BackmediumHeapGoogleAmazon

Tome Signal Consolidator 48 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing tome and signal metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target consolidator value under given operational constraints. The target consolidator value is the maximum value in the sequence after removing the two maximum elements.

Example 1
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Output
3

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], we construct a max heap and then remove the maximum element twice, giving output 3 as the target consolidator value

Example 2
Input
[10, 20, 30, 40, 50]
Output
30

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [10, 20, 30, 40, 50], we construct a max heap and then remove the maximum element twice, giving output 30 as the target consolidator value

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Tome Signal Consolidator 48 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

HeapMedium2D Grid DP
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing tome and signal metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target consolidator value under given operational constraints. The target consolidator value is the maximum value in the sequence after removing the two maximum elements.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Tome Signal Consolidator 48"

medium

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Identifying top‑k elements is a recurring pattern in performance‑critical code.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

Reducing from O(n log n) to O(n) while keeping memory constant is the key win.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

It mirrors priority‑queue handling in task schedulers where only the highest‑priority jobs matter.

Prefer a fixed‑size min‑heap or three variables; avoid dynamic structures that grow with input size.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n)
💾 Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The problem reduces to finding the third largest element in an unsorted array. A naive sort (O(n log n)) or scanning for max twice (O(n) each) wastes time and memory, especially for massive streams where only constant extra space is permissible. The optimal paradigm leverages a min‑heap of fixed size three (or three variables) to keep track of the top three values while traversing the data once, guaranteeing O(n) time and O(1) auxiliary space. This approach exploits the heap property: the smallest of the three candidates is always at the root, allowing efficient replacement when a larger element appears.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How would you find the third maximum element in a single pass without sorting?

Maintain three variables (or a size‑3 min‑heap) for the largest, second, and third values, updating them as you iterate. Each element is compared at most three times, yielding O(n) time.

Q2Why is a full sort overkill for this problem?

Sorting costs O(n log n) even though we only need three order statistics. A linear‑time selection or bounded heap avoids unnecessary work.

Q3What edge cases must you handle when the array has fewer than three distinct elements?

If the length is <3, the answer is undefined or you return the maximum after removing available maxes. Duplicate values also require careful comparison to avoid counting the same element twice.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Output

3

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], we construct a max heap and then remove the maximum element twice, giving output 3 as the target consolidator value

Example 2

Input

[10, 20, 30, 40, 50]

Output

30

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [10, 20, 30, 40, 50], we construct a max heap and then remove the maximum element twice, giving output 30 as the target consolidator value

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Use a min‑heap of size three (or three variables) to keep the three largest values while iterating, achieving O(n) time and O(1) space.

Brute Force Approach

Sort the entire array and pick the element at index n‑3, which is O(n log n) time and O(1) extra space.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
function solution(nums) {
       let maxHeap = new MaxHeap();
       for (let num of nums) {
           maxHeap.insert(num);
       }
       maxHeap.removeMax();
       maxHeap.removeMax();
       return maxHeap.getMax();
   }

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.