BackhardBit ManipulationGoogleAmazon

Matrix Vessel Tracker 18 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing matrix and vessel metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target tracker value under given operational constraints.

Example 1
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 3
Output
15

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] and K = 3, we iterate over the array and sum up all elements less than or equal to 3. This gives us 1 + 2 + 3 = 6, but we also include 4 and 5 because they are less than or equal to 3. However, this is incorrect. The correct sum should be 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. But we should not include 4 and 5. So the correct answer is 6 + 4 + 5 = 15.

Example 2
Input
[10, 20, 30], 25
Output
0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [10, 20, 30] and K = 25, we iterate over the array and sum up all elements less than or equal to 25. However, there are no elements less than or equal to 25 in the array. Therefore, the correct answer is 0.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Matrix Vessel Tracker 18 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Bit ManipulationHardDFS Traversal
TimeO(N)
|
SpaceO(N/64)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing matrix and vessel metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target tracker value under given operational constraints.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Matrix Vessel Tracker 18"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Bit manipulation is essential for optimizing memory footprint and computational speed in scenarios involving large-scale state tracking. It transforms problems that appear to require O(N) space or time into O(1) or O(N/word_size) operations, which is critical for real-time systems and embedded environments.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key insight is recognizing that the 'target tracker value' is not a sum but a logical combination of states. By mapping each metric to a specific bit position, you can use bitwise OR to accumulate states and bitwise AND to filter them, avoiding the need for loops or conditional branches in the innermost computation.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

This pattern is analogous to how modern CPUs manage cache lines or how network protocols (like TCP) use header bits to indicate flags (SYN, ACK, FIN). Just as a network packet uses specific bits to convey status without extra payload, the 'Matrix Vessel Tracker' uses bits to encode complex metric states into compact integers.

During an interview, explicitly mention 'word-level parallelism.' Explain that while the logical complexity is O(N), the constant factor is reduced by a factor of 64 (or 32) because the CPU processes 64 bits in a single instruction. This demonstrates a deep understanding of hardware-level optimization.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(N)
đź’ľ Space:O(N/64)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The 'Matrix Vessel Tracker' problem fundamentally relies on the properties of bitwise operations to efficiently aggregate state across a large dataset. In traditional arithmetic, summing or combining values from a matrix or sequence of metrics requires O(N) operations per query or update, which becomes prohibitive for high-frequency data streams. Bit manipulation allows us to encode multiple states into a single integer, leveraging the fact that bitwise AND, OR, and XOR operations are constant-time (O(1)) and can be parallelized at the hardware level. This is particularly relevant when tracking 'vessel' metrics—such as capacity flags, status bits, or checksums—where the goal is to determine a composite state rather than a simple numerical sum.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How would you design a system to track the status of 10,000 network nodes using minimal memory, where each node has 8 distinct status flags?

Use a bitset or a series of integers where each bit represents a specific flag for a node. For 10,000 nodes with 8 flags, you can pack 8 nodes into a single 64-bit integer (or use a dedicated bitset library). This reduces memory overhead by a factor of 8 compared to using booleans or integers per flag, and allows for fast bitwise operations to check or update multiple nodes simultaneously.

Q2In a distributed system, how can you use XOR to detect if a specific data packet was lost or corrupted during transmission without storing the entire history?

Compute the XOR of all packet IDs or checksums at the sender and receiver. If the packets are identical, the XOR of the combined set will be zero (since x ^ x = 0). If a packet is missing or corrupted, the result will be non-zero, indicating a discrepancy. This allows for O(1) space verification of integrity across a stream of data.

Q3Why is using bitwise operations preferred over arithmetic operations for flag management in high-performance trading engines?

Bitwise operations are executed in a single CPU cycle and do not involve carry propagation or complex ALU logic required for addition or multiplication. In trading engines where microsecond latency is critical, checking or updating a flag (e.g., 'order filled', 'risk limit hit') via bitwise AND/OR is significantly faster than checking boolean variables or performing arithmetic checks, reducing instruction pipeline stalls.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 3

Output

15

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] and K = 3, we iterate over the array and sum up all elements less than or equal to 3. This gives us 1 + 2 + 3 = 6, but we also include 4 and 5 because they are less than or equal to 3. However, this is incorrect. The correct sum should be 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. But we should not include 4 and 5. So the correct answer is 6 + 4 + 5 = 15.

Example 2

Input

[10, 20, 30], 25

Output

0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [10, 20, 30] and K = 25, we iterate over the array and sum up all elements less than or equal to 25. However, there are no elements less than or equal to 25 in the array. Therefore, the correct answer is 0.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Encode each metric's state into a specific bit position within a 64-bit integer. Use bitwise OR operations to accumulate the states across the sequence, allowing for constant-time state aggregation and extraction using bitwise AND masks.

Brute Force Approach

Iterate through each element in the matrix and use a series of if-else statements or boolean arrays to track the status of each metric individually. This results in O(N * M) time complexity where M is the number of metrics, and high memory overhead due to storing separate flags for each element.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(N)
function solution(nums, k) {
   let sum = 0;
   for (let num of nums) {
       if (num <= k) {
           sum += num;
       }
   }
   return sum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.