BackeasyBit ManipulationGoogleAmazon

Protocol Pipeline Aligner 10 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing protocol and pipeline metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target aligner value under given operational constraints. The input array is of integers and the value of K is provided.

Example 1
Input
[10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 25, 5]
Output
130

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 25, 5], we need to find the sum of elements greater than K (25). We iterate through the array and add 30, 40, 50 to the sum, giving us a total of 130.

Example 2
Input
[5, 10, 15, 20, 25]
Output
120

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [5, 10, 15, 20, 25], we need to find the sum of elements greater than K (15). We iterate through the array and add 20, 25 to the sum, giving us a total of 45. However, the problem statement asks for the sum of elements greater than K, so we should ignore the elements 5, 10, 15. Therefore, the correct output is 45, not 120.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Protocol Pipeline Aligner 10 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Bit ManipulationEasyDFS Traversal
TimeO(N)
|
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing protocol and pipeline metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target aligner value under given operational constraints. The input array is of integers and the value of K is provided.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Protocol Pipeline Aligner 10"

easy

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Sliding‑window bit‑frequency patterns turn expensive recomputation into constant‑time updates.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is reducing per‑window work from O(K) to O(1) by exploiting bit‑level invariants.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Network packet aggregators often need to maintain bit‑flags over moving time windows, mirroring this technique.

Cache the bit counts in a fixed‑size array and update them incrementally; avoid rebuilding the OR from scratch.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(N)
💾 Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The problem reduces to evaluating the bitwise OR over sliding windows of length K. A naive solution recomputes the OR from scratch for each window, leading to O(N·K) time, which quickly becomes prohibitive for N up to 10^5. The optimal paradigm leverages the fact that OR is monotonic: once a bit is set in the window it stays set until all elements containing that bit exit the window. By maintaining a frequency count of each bit (0‑31 for 32‑bit integers) we can update the window in O(1) per step, achieving O(N·B) where B is the number of bits, effectively O(N). This bit‑frequency sliding‑window technique transforms a quadratic‑ish brute force into a linear‑time solution while using only O(B) extra space.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1Why can we update a sliding‑window OR in O(1) instead of recomputing it each time?

Because OR is idempotent and monotonic; we only need to track how many numbers in the window contribute each bit.

Q2What is the worst‑case time complexity of the optimized solution and why?

O(N) because each element enters and leaves the window exactly once and each bit update is O(1) for a fixed 32‑bit integer.

Q3How would the algorithm change if the operation were bitwise AND instead of OR?

For AND we must track the count of zeros per bit, because a bit stays 1 only while all elements have it set; the update logic flips accordingly.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 25, 5]

Output

130

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 25, 5], we need to find the sum of elements greater than K (25). We iterate through the array and add 30, 40, 50 to the sum, giving us a total of 130.

Example 2

Input

[5, 10, 15, 20, 25]

Output

120

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [5, 10, 15, 20, 25], we need to find the sum of elements greater than K (15). We iterate through the array and add 20, 25 to the sum, giving us a total of 45. However, the problem statement asks for the sum of elements greater than K, so we should ignore the elements 5, 10, 15. Therefore, the correct output is 45, not 120.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Maintain a per‑bit frequency array while sliding the window, updating counters in O(1) per move and recomputing the OR from the counters.

Brute Force Approach

Compute the OR for every possible window of size K by iterating K elements each time, resulting in O(N·K) time.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(N)
function solution(nums, K) {
   let sum = 0;
   for (let num of nums) {
       if (num > K) {
           sum += num;
       }
   }
   return sum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.